You do not need a listed-company board structure to apply King IV well. Which principles genuinely matter for a smaller company — and the practices that make the biggest difference.
· By Tavison Mugorogodi, Partner — Audit, Risk & Governance
Mention King IV to the owner of a growing business and you can watch the shutters come down: boards, committees, charters — machinery for listed companies, surely. In fact, King IV was deliberately written to apply to all organisations, proportionately, and its central demand is not bureaucracy. It is that someone can explain, honestly, how the business is being directed and controlled.
King IV works on an "apply and explain" basis: you apply its principles and explain the practices you use to achieve them. It is voluntary for private companies (some sectors and public entities aside), but that is not the point. The point is that banks, funders, enterprise customers and B-BBEE verification agencies increasingly use governance questions in their due diligence — and "we have never thought about it" is the one answer that fails.
For an owner-managed company, the honest question is not "how do we build a board like a listed company's?" It is: what would break if you doubled in size, or if you stepped away for three months? King IV's principles, scaled properly, are simply the answer to that question written down.
Governance done this way is not overhead. It is what lets an owner delegate without losing control — and it turns due diligence from an ordeal into a formality. That is the working philosophy of our internal audit, risk and governance practice.
Tavison Mugorogodi CIA leads the firm's internal audit, risk and governance practice, with 20 years of internal audit experience across mining, state-owned enterprises, medical schemes, universities and donor-funded organisations. Read the full profile →
We implement proportionate King IV practices for owner-managed businesses — enough structure to satisfy funders and customers, without corporate bureaucracy.
Book a consultation